I wanted to build an awesome place for people to discuss module specific issues, but I don't have any more time for this, and there are much better places to discuss Perl-related issues. I'd recommend asking your question on Stack Overflow or on Perl Monks.
If you are looking for a Perl tutorial or Perl-related news, I hope these links will serve you well.
Posted on 2009-11-05 21:18:36-08 by tpc1095
Did SOAP::Lite version 0.710.08 regress?
I have a small SOAP::Lite client I've been running for about a week, and in the process of trying to get attachments working, I upgraded to SOAP:Lite 0.710.08 and Perl 5.10.1 (ActiveState ppm, Windows XP) . Now my program has stopped working and I get a bunch of errors in the console. I have tried several variations of ppms for SOAP::Lite. I am wondering of other folks have run into this same problem.
Subroutine SOAP::Lite::Deserializer::XMLSchemaSOAP1_2::as_dateTime redefined at C:/Perl/site/lib/SO +AP/Lite/Deserializer/XMLSchemaSOAP1_2.pm line 20. Subroutine SOAP::Lite::Deserializer::XMLSchema2001::as_dateTime redefined at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/ +Lite/Deserializer/XMLSchema2001.pm line 29. Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in pattern match (m//) at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 343. Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 3481. Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in pattern match (m//) at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 343. Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 3481. Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in pattern match (m//) at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 343. Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at C:/Perl/site/lib/SOAP/Lite.pm line 3481. A fault (axis2ns17:Client) occurred: The endpoint reference (EPR) for the Operation not found is ht +tps://localhost:9843/services/LoginService and the WSA Action = testNamespace:loginUsingUserCreden +tial#
Direct Responses: 11725 | Write a response
Posted on 2009-11-06 20:25:44-08 by tpc1095 in response to 11706
Re: Did SOAP::Lite version 0.710.08 regress?
It seems the new software revealed a bug in my code. My apologies.
Direct Responses: Write a response