Hi @all,

if you read the rating comments for Weather-Com, you'll see that Robert Rothenberg mentioned, the name 'Weather-Com' does not fit into the Perl Namespace...

To fit into the Namespace, the name should be more explanatory in terms of use, the way the data is gotten, etc. but not only to show where the data comes from (weather.com).

Valid names could be things like 'WWW-WeatherCom' or 'WebService-Weather' or something like that.

I'd like to ask "the community" what could be a nice name in your opinion. What should we call the 1.0 release of 'Weather-Com'?

Thomas