Posted on 2005-11-24 10:26:35-08 by kforner in response to 789
Re: Text::Editor::Vip RFC
Hello,

I'm not sure that this project is still alive, but I'll try anyway...

I'm convinced of the interest of such a project. I'm a xemacs fan user, but it is incredibly difficult to extend and understand because LISP, no namespaces, bad API documentation and I always dreamed about a nice Perl editor.

Here are some points that I believe are important

* it should be easy to install : and easy to install extensions, and automatic updates. So it implies that on all systems we can provide a tarball that contains all : the interpreter, the relevant CPAN packages,, the editor, templates, doc...

* it should work on all platforms from the beginning, including windows, to gain a maximum of developers and users. Moreover all modern IDEs have to be multiplatform.

* Good long-term conception (mean no limitations in the buffer size or things like this) but frequent releases.

* Not too many features : there's nothing more frustrating than features that do not work well or do not work at all. I prefer a few rock-solid features. so a lot of regression tests.

* for the GUI: overuse of context menus - for example, rather to have to remember keyboard shortcut or navigating in the menu for example to close or rename a tab, right click on the tab.

* GUI again: collaboration with Gtk2Perl and Gtk teams.

Direct Responses: Write a response
Perl Weekly newsletter
A free weekly newsletter for people who are busy to read all the blogs. click here to check it out.